top-100-ai-tools-2025
top-100-ai-tools-2025
Real Story: Why Do We Need an AI Top 100 Comparison?
Every day, Xiao Zhou from the operations team uses at least 8 different AI tools: writing, layout design, image generation, research, video editing, meeting summarization, translation notes, and more.
Everyone in the team uses different tools — resulting in inconsistent efficiency and an unstandardized workflow.
To solve the problem of “too many tools, too hard to choose,” she compiled a pros & cons list of the 100 most commonly used AI tools. After aligning the whole team to use a standardized toolset:
- Content output efficiency increased by 3×
- Tool learning cost decreased by 70%
- Workflow became standardized
- Saved thousands of dollars in SaaS costs every month
This article is built upon that real scenario — presenting the 2025 AI Tools Top 100 Comparison Table.
Top 100 AI Tools of 2025 — Full Pros & Cons Table
| # | Tool | Category | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ChatGPT 5.1 | General LLM | Strong reasoning, versatile | Advanced features costly |
| 2 | Claude 3.7 | General LLM | Best long-text reasoning | Not available in some regions |
| 3 | Gemini 2.0 | Multimodal | Strong vision/video understanding | Response stability varies |
| 4 | Kimi | Long-context LLM | Million-token context | Weaker technical reasoning |
| 5 | Grok 3 | General model | Real-time knowledge, fast | Creative writing average |
| 6 | Perplexity Pro | AI Search | Verified citations, real-time | Expensive for heavy users |
| 7 | Arc Search | AI Browser | Auto-read & auto-summaries | Depth not always controllable |
| 8 | Rewind AI | Personal memory | Automatic activity capture | Privacy concerns |
| 9 | Pi AI | Emotional assistant | Natural friendly tone | Not ideal for technical tasks |
| 10 | Notion AI | Work + Writing | All-in-one workspace | Writing quality average |
| 11 | Jasper AI | Brand writing | Strong brand voice | Templates feel repetitive |
| 12 | Copy.ai | Marketing | Rich templates | Creativity limited |
| 13 | Writer | Enterprise writing | Style consistency | Expensive |
| 14 | Midjourney | Image generation | Best artistic quality | No web UI, Discord only |
| 15 | Leonardo AI | Image generation | High control, many models | Complex for beginners |
| 16 | Adobe Firefly | Image tools | Copyright-safe | Less creative |
| 17 | Runway | Video generation | Leading text-to-video | High compute cost |
| 18 | Pika Labs | Video | Stable, fast | Limited fine control |
| 19 | Canva AI | Design | User-friendly | Limited pro design features |
| 20 | CapCut AI | Video editing | Excellent templates | Weak for pro editing |
| 21 | Descript | AV editing | Text-based editing | Learning curve |
| 22 | ElevenLabs | Voice | Most natural voices | Pricing high |
| 23 | Udio | Music generation | Great melodies | Not for pro composers |
| 24 | Suno AI | Music | Easy to use | Limited customization |
| 25 | Whisper V3 | Speech recognition | Very accurate | Requires GPU power |
| 26 | HeyGen | Digital humans | Highly realistic | Expensive commercial license |
| 27 | Synthesia | Digital humans | Enterprise usage | Limited creativity |
| 28 | Zoom AI Companion | Meetings | Strong auto-notes | Paid feature |
| 29 | Microsoft Copilot | Office | Deep Office integration | Subscription required |
| 30 | Google Workspace AI | Office | Great in Gmail/Docs | Higher cost |
| 31 | AutoGPT 2 | AI agent | Strong multi-task ability | Setup complexity |
| 32 | Devin AI | Code agent | End-to-end coding | Very slow, limited supply |
| 33 | Cursor IDE | AI IDE | Best auto-refactor | Hard for beginners |
| 34 | GitHub Copilot | Coding | Great code completion | Weak deep reasoning |
| 35 | Windsurf IDE | AI IDE | Model-first interface | Smaller ecosystem |
| 36 | Replit AI | Cloud IDE | Beginner-friendly | Limited for large projects |
| 37 | Phind | Search + coding | Good citations | Weak creative writing |
| 38 | Codeium | Coding | Free & strong | Lacks pro features |
| 39 | Tabnine | Coding | Private models | Logic weaker than GPT |
| 40 | Grammarly | Writing | Grammar checking excellent | Not creative |
| 41 | QuillBot | Rewriting | Concise rewriting | Not fully human-like |
| 42 | DeepL Write | Writing | High-quality rewriting | Tone options limited |
| 43 | DeepL Translate | Translation | Industry best | Fewer languages |
| 44 | ChatDOC | Document AI | Strong PDF QA | Slower with big files |
| 45 | Mita AI (秘塔) | Document OCR | Good table extraction | Mixed layout errors |
| 46 | Elicit | Academic | Auto paper search | Limited Chinese support |
| 47 | Scite AI | Academic | Citation reliability | Many features paid |
| 48 | ScholarAI | Academic plugin | GPT integration | Limited databases |
| 49 | Wolfram Alpha | Math engine | Precise math logic | Weak natural language |
| 50 | MathGPT | Math | Clear step-by-step | Limited coverage |
| 51 | SlideAI | Slides | Auto-generate decks | Template variety low |
| 52 | Gamma | Slides | Beautiful designs | Hard to customize |
| 53 | Tome | Narrative decks | Great storytelling | Rigid structure |
| 54 | Beautiful.ai | Slides | Business-friendly | Low flexibility |
| 55 | Readwise Reader | Reading | Knowledge organization strong | Subscription required |
| 56 | Glasp | Highlighting | Web annotation | Simple feature set |
| 57 | Aomni | AI Search | Great research summaries | New product (unstable) |
| 58 | Humata AI | PDF QA | Strong doc extraction | Depends on formatting |
| 59 | LLaMA 3 | Open-source | Self-host freedom | Needs technical setup |
| 60 | Mixtral | Open-source | Fast & efficient | Reasoning limited |
| 61 | Ollama | Local models | Full privacy | Hardware-limited |
| 62 | NotebookLM | Knowledge | Good document linking | Partial language support |
| 63 | Firefly Image | Image | Reliable content | Not very creative |
| 64 | Leonardo Motion | Motion graphics | Great for ads | Limited control |
| 65 | Kaiber | Animation | Easy stylization | Hard to fine-tune |
| 66 | Luma Dream Machine | Video | High realism | Slow generation |
| 67 | Vidu | Video | Strong Asian style | Limited prompts |
| 68 | LeiaPix | 3D | One-click 3D | Low detail |
| 69 | Character.AI | Roleplay | Good personality simulation | Weak factual accuracy |
| 70 | Replika | Emotional AI | Good companionship | Weak as a tool |
| 71 | Figma AI | UI/UX | Smart auto-layout | Slow with large files |
| 72 | Diagram AI | UI | Generate components | Early-stage |
| 73 | Khroma | Color palette | Great color matching | Niche use |
| 74 | Remove.bg | Image | Best cut-out tool | Complex cases fail |
| 75 | Cleanup.pictures | Photo | Clean object removal | Quality drops on HD |
| 76 | Poe | Multi-model hub | Fast model switching | Premium needed |
| 77 | AgentGPT | AI agent | Auto task execution | Unstable |
| 78 | Taskade AI | Collaboration | Notes + tasks unified | Limited depth |
| 79 | Coda AI | Docs | AI-enhanced tables | Learning curve |
| 80 | Airtable AI | Database | Smart fill & queries | Complex logic needs scripts |
| 81 | Zapier AI | Automation | Strong integrations | Expensive |
| 82 | Make (Integromat) | Automation | Visual workflows | Hard to master |
| 83 | Loopin AI | Meeting notes | Auto summaries | Mainly English |
| 84 | Otter.ai | Speech-to-text | Good for meetings | Chinese accuracy low |
| 85 | Fireflies.ai | Meeting AI | Good summaries | Noise sensitive |
| 86 | Tldraw AI | Whiteboard | Auto diagramming | Lightweight |
| 87 | Miro AI | Whiteboard | Smart summaries | Creativity limited |
| 88 | FigJam AI | Ideation | Auto sticky notes | Weak deep logic |
| 89 | Ideogram 2 | Image | Best text-rendering images | Style inconsistent |
| 90 | Wonder Dynamics | CG animation | Auto motion-tracking | Heavy compute |
| 91 | HeyPi | Emotional AI | Friendly companion | Low information depth |
| 92 | Claude Artifacts | Coding UI | Visual outputs great | New ecosystem |
| 93 | Google Veo | Video | High-quality video | Limited fine-control |
| 94 | Audiogen | Audio | Generate sound effects | Small library |
| 95 | Murf AI | Voiceover | Natural voices | Few tones |
| 96 | PlayHT 2.0 | Voice | Multi-speaker quality | Expensive |
| 97 | LightPDF AI | Document tools | Multi-format | Accuracy varies |
| 98 | AI PDF | QA tool | Simple & fast | Limited features |
| 99 | Genius Sheets | Excel AI | Auto spreadsheets | Narrow scenarios |
| 100 | Excel Formula Bot | Excel assistant | Instant formulas | Complex logic inaccurate |
Summary
What truly matters in 2025 is not the number of tools, but how you combine them into your own productivity system.
The Top 100 comparison table can serve as a “tool selection guide” and a reference for standardizing daily workflows for teams.
What does this article mainly introduce?
This article highlights the 20 most noteworthy AI tools in 2025, referencing the Top 100 AI lists released by Visual Capitalist and a16z in 2024, and explores trends and popular applications in the AI tools ecosystem.
Which types of AI tools were most popular in 2024?
According to the article, the most popular AI tools in 2024 were primarily generative creation tools—including image, video, and audio generation—as well as chatbots, writing assistants, grammar checkers, and productivity tools.
Which AI tool had remarkable usage in 2024?
ChatGPT maintained extremely high usage in 2024, ranking first among all AI tools with a large lead over Gemini.
Besides chatbots, what other categories of AI tools were popular?
In addition to chatbots, photo editors and educational learning AI tools also appeared prominently in the rankings.